Wednesday, March 19, 2014

SEA Data Table

Reading is made up of many different components and skills.  Reading is the combination of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension all rolled together into one.  If you think about it, reading is very complex.  There are many people who struggle with one or more aspects of reading.  As a teacher, it can be frustrating not knowing why a student is struggling and then not knowing how to help them become a better reader. 
            There are many tools out there for teachers to use that can assist in diagnosing a student who may need further help with reading.  There are several formal and informal assessments that can be used to steer teachers in the right direction when it comes to helping their students.
SIT (Slossan Intelligence Test)
            The first test that I researched was called the SIT or the Slossan Intelligence Test.  This test is used to test verbal and cognitive ability in children or adults.  There are several great aspects of this test.  The one I found most fascinating is that it is available to all types of learners… even those with disabilities.  It is also a test that can be given in under 20 minutes so that the teacher and student are not bogged down with a test that takes hours to administer.  The major weakness I found that there is a lack of reliability and validity with the research that has been done on this test.  Basically they are saying that it is outdated.  In spite of that, it is still a widely used test that can be used to test verbal and cognitive ability.
SORT (Slossan Oral Reading Test)
            The second test I researched was called the SORT or the Slossan Oral Reading Test.  This test is used to evaluate word recognition, word calling, and reading level.  This assessment is given in only 3-5 minutes by a student reading lists of 20 words at time.  The student reads until he or she become frustrated and cannot read anymore of the given words.  This test can be given to any person of any age.  Teachers are able to use this assessment to place students into reading levels.  The biggest downfall to this test is that there is no evaluation of other reading skills like comprehension or vocabulary.  This test may need to be combined with another test to be able to assess a student’s overall reading ability. 
BRI (Basic Reading Inventory)
            The next test I researched was the BRI or the Basic Reading Inventory.  This is a more time consuming test than the previous tests but it also covers more aspects of reading.  This assessment can evaluate phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension all at the same time, within the same test.  It begins with a student reading from a list of given words at a certain grade level.  After so many mistakes, the child will become frustrated and then the teacher will know what grade level he or she is on when it comes to word recognition.  The next step is to read a short story and answer comprehension and vocabulary questions about it.  The teacher can also assess their fluency by seeing how many words per minute the child can read.  As you can see, this test can take up to an hour to administer and that might be too long for some children.  I also found from my Practicum student that I am tutoring that the reading level from the BRI is much higher than what it is in the classroom.  I’m not sure if that is a curriculum issue or a BRI issue.  One of the greatest strengths I found with the BRI is that teachers can track progress with their students.  Most of the other tests do not have this option.  The BRI has several different word lists and several different stories for comprehension.  From all the other assessments I researched, I believe that the BRI is probably the most through test and the one that covers the most material.  

WADT (Wepman’s Auditory Discrimination Test)
            The WADT or the Wepman’s Auditory Discrimination Test is an assessment that measures how well a person understands speech and the spoken word.  This test is appropriate for any age group but is most effective when it is administered to younger children.  This test can be used to determine if students will have a hard time with letter sounds or phonics.  It can also discover if a student has communication or speech problems.  The test can be given fairly quickly and it is inexpensive to purchase.  Teachers can use the results from this test to determine if a child might have a learning disability, might struggle with reading, or might have a hearing impairment.
Slingerland (Visual Discrimination Test)
            The final test that I researched was called the Slingerland Visual Discrimination Test.  This assessment tests specifically for dyslexia and language disabilities which are actually visual processing disorders.  In other words, this test targets students who are believed to have symptoms of dyslexia.  In addition to basically diagnosing dyslexia, it can also identify a student’s strengths and weakness in their language development or visual discrimination.  This test is available for everyone; however there are more specific tests to specific ages.  For example, administers would not give a 1st grader the same test as a high school student when trying to diagnose dyslexia so there are several tests to choose from.  The biggest downfall for the Slingerland test is that it is expensive and teachers have to pay to take a course on how to administer the test.  This test would not be given to every student but only to those who are suspected of having a learning disability.
            After conducting all the previous research, I have come to one conclusion.  I now realize that there is not just one test that can be used to assess a student’s reading ability.  Just like reading itself is complex, so is the assessment of reading.  The SIT can assess a student’s verbal and cognitive abilities.  The SORT can evaluate a student’s word recognition and reading level.  The BRI can assess fluency and comprehension and the WADT can determine how well a child can understand spoken words.  Finally, the Slingerland test can identify specific learning disabilities like dyslexia.
Teachers need to be willing to use all the necessary means to help a child learn to read.  These tests all have strengths and weaknesses but they can assess best when combined with one another.  Using a combination of these assessments and classroom tools, teachers can meet the needs of all learners.

Purpose
Strengths
Weaknesses
Appropriateness
SIT (Slosson Intelligence Test)
*measures intelligence
*measures verbal and cognitive ability
*suitable for any type of learner
*can help screen for a learning disability
*test can be administered in 10-20 minutes
*can be used for screening but not diagnosis disability
*research shows there is not much validity or reliability
*outdated
*for infants-adult
*appropriate for those with special needs
SORT (Slosson Oral Reading Test)
*measures the level of oral word recognition, word calling and reading level
*quick screening to determine a student’s reading level
*test only takes about 5 minutes
*can determine if further diagnosis is needed
*doesn’t assess all aspects of reading like comprehension
*for ages preschool-adult
*appropriate for all students to be placed in a reading level
BRI (Basic Reading Inventory)
*measures a student’s ability in word recognition, fluency and comprehension
*affordable
*can help teachers see where a student is struggling
*assesses reading level
*can track progress
*tests all aspects of reading
*may not meet the same reading level as all curriculums
*can be time consuming
*for all ages and ability levels
WADT (Wepman’s Auditory Discrimination Test)
*measures how well a person understands speech and the spoken word
*fast and inexpensive
*can assess for communication problems, phonics problems and speech issues
*cannot track progress
*for ages preschool-adult
*most effective the earlier a problem is detected
Slingerland (Visual Discrimination Test)
*tests specifically for dyslexia and language disability which is a visual processing disorder
*can a diagnose dyslexia
*identifies strengths and weaknesses in language learners
*only targets a specific disability
*expensive
*educators must take a course in order to administer the test
*for all ages
*there are different tests for different age/ability groups



References
Alic, M. (2014). Auditory Discrimination Test. Retrieved on March 15, 2014 from
Johns, J. (2012). Basic Reading Inventory (11th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing
            Company.
McKechnie, J., & Bradley, E. (2001). Test Review: Slosson Intelligence Test Revised (SIT-R).
            Retrieved on March 15, 2014 from http://aac.net.edu/newsnotes/y01win.html
Slingerland Institute for Literacy. (2014). Retrieved on March 15, 2014 from
Slosson Oral Reading Test. (2013). Retrieved on March 15, 2014 from
            www.cps.nova.edu/cpphelp/SORT/html



No comments:

Post a Comment